If your website isn’t fast, secure, and “understandable” by AI, you’re losing visibility and sales. In 2025, real user experience (Core Web Vitals like INP) and generative answers in search raise the bar. This guide compares—practically—when to avoid WordPress and why a custom CMS can better prepare your site for today’s reality.
Since 2024, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) replaced FID and measures the real responsiveness of the interface (clicks, taps, keyboard). This especially impacts stacks with multiple builders and plugins because they tend to inject redundant JavaScript and CSS that block the main thread.
The largest attack surface in WordPress is usually plugins and themes. More dependencies mean higher risk and more patching. Cross-version compatibility can also break critical functions (forms, gateways, cache) without warning.
Choosing the “cheapest” install can get expensive over time. Typical hidden costs include:
With a custom CMS, you invest in what you truly need and avoid the over-cost of complexity.
At Damos we build and maintain our own CMS focused on speed, security, and AI-readiness:
Explore the advantages of our CMS and how it compares to a traditional stack.
Still, if your goals are speed, security, AI integration, and scalability, a custom CMS is the most direct path.
The 2025 standard demands fast, secure, and AI-ready websites. If your stack depends on an unpredictable ecosystem of builders and plugins, every change will cost more. A custom CMS gives you control, stability, and business focus to compete today.
Our team of specialists can audit your current site and present a migration plan to “Editor.” Let’s talk:
Context note: this post updates and complements our 2021 article: “40 razones para no usar WordPress”.
Because of the accumulated complexity of plugins/themes, hidden maintenance costs, performance impact (INP), and a larger attack surface. A custom CMS reduces those frictions.
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) measures how quickly the interface responds to user interactions. High INP feels slow and can hurt SEO and conversions.
Initial setup can be similar or higher, but the Total Cost of Ownership is often lower by avoiding patches, incompatibilities, and constant third-party optimizations.
Yes. With a planned migration (URL mapping, 301 redirects, structured data, and performance testing) you preserve rankings and often improve Core Web Vitals.
The “Editor” CMS prioritizes semantic structure, Schema, and endpoints so agents can query and execute actions (lead capture, scheduling, order status).
Not required, but an API-first/headless architecture enables efficient rendering, asset control, and edge deployments—improving TTFB, LCP, and INP.
For very simple sites with minimal integrations, or if the team has the discipline to audit plugins and budget performance for every change.
Review of information architecture, Core Web Vitals, dependency surface, structured data, and integration points with CRM/automations.